Ancient Greece In the view of most people throughout history, moral questions have objectively correct answers.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you Kant and moral values essay with your essay and educational issues. Therefore, the basic of the ethic is duty. Kant said that morality must be completely self-contained and independent from any other view and he believed that this morality could only be found in a priori reason, priori meaning before experience.
This is a reasoning, which establishes basic principles. In the sense of duty, acting out of self-interest is wrong for Kant. For example, being honest because doing so helps your business, or acting out of love or sympathy is insufficient. This is acting to satisfy yourself and therefore it is a selfish act.
Inclinations or desires are therefore not complete as you are being self-interested rather than moral. Kant said that only morality motivated by itself could satisfy him. You have to be moral, purely because being moral is the right thing to do.
Kant believed that you command yourself to act morally, innately. For him, the principles of ethics are self-governing of religion and also that every individual is morally autonomous and can make their own moral decisions.
From the above, Kant developed his thoughts on goodwill, which he believed to be the sole intrinsic good. He said that it is good in itself and requires no further qualification.
In deontology, good will is the highest form of good and it is not dependant on decisions that we come to. So, it establishes the means by which we should proceed, not the end.
Kant then tried to establish a set of principles, to answer that willing the good depends on knowing what the good is and means. He spoke of imperatives, or types of command, as this is where he says that the mind commands itself.
The first kind of imperative was known as hypothetical and these prescribed what you should do as a means to an end. Kant said that it is not the consequences of an action that make them right or wrong, but the motives of the person who carries out the action.
This is because consequences could have come about without meaning to in an action, which was meant to be bad, or cause harm. The second kind was called Categorical Imperatives. These principles were absolute in the process of moral reasoning and could be applied anywhere and at anytime. In his first imperative, Kant said that to determine a genuine moral imperative, it must be universifiable.
It also assumes that everyone is equal. In his second imperative, Kant said you must act as if you were a law-making member of in a kingdom of ends.
In his last imperative, Kant said that all people have to be regarded as valuable and should not be used as a means to an end. Furthermore, according to Kant, our behaviour is determined from the point of view of an external observer but we experience ourselves as being free.
Therefore, although we are free in thought, our choices and moral decisions are determined for us already.
Also, any decisions that are come to are made autonomously and should be made for everyone to follow, in that situation, anywhere they are.
How helpful would this theory be when faced with the question of abortion? Placing this is the context of abortion would be difficult to universalise to a range of differing situations. For example, if a woman was raped and this lead to her being pregnant then she may want to terminate the baby.
For some, to abort it, may be a form of duty and goodwill, to prevent her from suffering psychologically as the child grows up. However, if the foetus was terminated it would become a universal law, so what would happen if someone became pregnant out of carelessness?
In addition, when Kant says that all people are regarded as valuable, how exactly do we respect others in a situation?
This Kant does not explain. Each person has different ideas of respecting and they may do so through their own personal feelings and interests, so it is hard to apply to everybody and be universal when each of us is different.
Deontology does not take this into account, but instead tells s to act out of duty, not care. Kant discourages the fact that the end should be thought of when making a moral decision but can the future result be forgotten when deciding?
In conclusion, this theory in relation to abortion would not be classed as helpful, because the end result of the baby should be thought of when making a decision, as it too is a person.The Moral values is one of the most popular assignments among students' documents.
If you are stuck with writing or missing ideas, scroll down and find inspiration in the best samples. Moral values is quite a rare and popular topic for writing an essay, but it certainly is in our database. Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?
[Michael J. Sandel] on torosgazete.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. For Michael Sandel, justice is not a spectator sport, The Nation 's reviewer of Justice remarked.
In his acclaimed book―based on his legendary Harvard course―Sandel offers a rare education in thinking through the complicated issues and controversies we face in public life today.
An essay on moral values and everyman morality play essay questions raises a situation of dilemma between virtue and vice whereas an essay on moral courage examines the situation that called for that person to listen to their conscience and stand firm on their decision despite any opposition.
The humanity formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative demands that we treat humanity as an end in itself. Because this principle resonates with currently influential ideals of human rights and dignity, contemporary readers often find it compelling, even if the rest of Kant’s moral philosophy leaves them cold.
The Fallacies of Egoism and Altruism, and the Fundamental Principle of Morality (after Kant and Nelson) I have not done wrong. The "Negative Confession" or Protestation of Ani, The Egyptian Book of the Dead, The Book of Going Forth by Day, The Complete Papyrus of Ani, Featuring Integrated Text and Full-Color Images, translated by Dr.
Faulkner [, , Chronicle Books, San. Kant's moral philosophy marks a transition from the description and explanation of morality, to the theoretical analysis of morality as a special and specific phenomenon. Kant's intention on the contrary to Nietzsche is to reveal the purity of morals.